Green is the New Red
Commentary for 12 April 2015
IPCC and US government devotion to the greenhouse gas theory of climate change is particularly troubling because the theory has been shown to be an abject failure of historic proportions. Sadly, through the ‘Climategate’ e-mails and many other disclosures of scientific misconduct, we now know the ‘settled’ science was never about the science in the first place.
- John L. Casey, Dark Winter
The deep causes of global warming are not being dealt with here. The origin of global warming lies in capitalism. If we could end capitalism then we would have a solution.
- Evo Morales, President of Bolivia
Evo Morales is a radical socialist whose hero is Che Guevara. He wants to put an end to capitalism, and he offers an argument for doing so. There are many others who secretly want what Morales wants. But they are not willing to raise a red banner as he does. Instead, they raise a green banner. Of course, they do not actually care about the environment. The theory of anthropogenic global warming is an ideological weapon used by anti-capitalists. Once a decisive majority believes in global warming, capitalism is finished. That is the reason for the theory of anthropogenic global warming in the first place.
We live in an age of falsification. There is a disinformation mechanism behind this falsification. It is very powerful, and tramples down its enemies. One might say, in perfect seriousness, that this mechanism is communist (because we have no other word for it). Before dealing with the subject at hand, the reader should first consider what an outrageous lie the theory of anthropogenic global warming is. When we are told by leading government officials that 97 percent of scientists believe in anthropogenic global warming, and when we find this is untrue, it is a plain case of organized and coordinated lying. When scientific data is fudged, and scientists’ careers are threatened, we see evidence of a ruthless conspiracy that will stop at nothing. When we see that temperatures are falling, and winters are getting colder instead of warmer, and we also see that greenhouse gas propaganda continues to intensify, we are left to conclude that we are confronting the latest incarnation of the big lie. Adolf Hitler described the big lie in Mein Kampf , Chapter 10 (James Murphy translation):
…in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
Communism and all related totalitarian movements depend on the big lie. And if the greenhouse gas theory of global warming partakes of this technique, then we must confirm that it is a propaganda weapon – used in a coordinated and organized attack on capitalism (as Morales indicated).
John L. Casey is a former NASA engineer. His book, Dark Winter, discusses climate science in terms of solar cycles. According to Casey, “Major changes taking place in the climate have already pulled the rug out from under the idea that mankind controls the climate.” The scientific evidence, if looked at properly, shows there has been no global warming for the last 17 years. Casey also says that “the actual record of global temperature trends shows the oceans and the atmosphere have actually been cooling for most of the last 11 years.” The sun passes through cycles, and according to Casey, we are headed toward a cold cycle, with the lowest temperatures predicted to occur between 2031 and 2037. “It is important to note,” says Casey, “that the … 1990-2010 warm period will be the last record warm period for the next 206 years….”
In November 2008, Prof. Don J. Easterbrook of Western Washington University wrote an article titled Global Cooling is Here. In this article he flatly stated, “Global warming is over. The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere was not the cause of the warming – it was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.” Last month Michael Bastasch published a piece at the Daily Caller about Jürgen Langeheine, a physicist with the German-based European Institute for Climate and Energy who says that solar radiation since 1998 has diminished, “and could reach values similar to those of the early twentieth century. A drop in global temperatures of the next few years is predicted.” Bastasch wrote another piece back in 2013 titled “Scientists predict a century of global cooling” in which he stated, “Scientists … have been increasingly turning against the global warming consensus and arguing that the world is actually in line for a colder century.”
Two years ago 125 scientists sent an open letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon stating that, “We the undersigned, qualified in climate-related matters, wish to state that current scientific knowledge does not substantiate your assertions [that global warming is proven].” These scientists went on to state that there has been no global warming during the previous 16 years. In fact, the letter says UN officials should be more worried about global cooling than global warming.
How did the theory of anthropogenic global warming become so powerful that 125 climate scientists wrote a letter to the General Secretary of the United Nations to complain? And why was the letter ignored by the UN General Secretary and the President of the United States? One might say that the scientists’ letter was completely futile. Clearly, there is a power at work – a power which is willing to crush truth, science and reason into dust. This power, in fact, would supplant science itself with a new set of superstitions, if only to guarantee its supremacy. It has no respect for truth, which it casually tramples in the dirt. It therefore has no respect for civilization. It is a power that originated in malcontents who have existed in every country, and that rule in certain countries called “communist.” These people have special characteristics, and they operate through hidden networks and fronts. Over the last 90 years they have been responsible for many outrageous falsifications and lies. Anthropogenic global warming is not their first and only lie.
In Pete Earley’s book, Comrade J, we learn that the “scientific” theory of nuclear winter originated from orders given by KGB Chief Yuri Andropov. Carl Sagan, a popular figure on American television, was a major public sponsor of the nuclear winter thesis, especially with regards to the famous TTAPS study (which purportedly validated the theory). Former KGB officer Sergei Tretyakov told Earley, “I am not a scientist, nor did I ever meet Mr. Sagan…. I did have several conversations with the former KGB official responsible for scientific propaganda during this time period, and she told me repeatedly the KGB was responsible for creating the entire nuclear winter story to stop the Pershing missiles [from being deployed by Reagan]. ” Tretyakov further stated, “I don’t know if Mr. Sagan ever knew the KGB was behind this effort, but inside the KGB, the nuclear winter propaganda was considered the ultimate example of how the KGB had completely alarmed the West with science….”
Again, the big lie technique, backed by agents of the KGB, can be spectacularly successful. Human beings are herd animals, and easily come to accept erroneous ideas that are presented as popular and widely accepted. Such ideas then become widely accepted through a process of mass hypnosis and auto-suggestion. When we study Nazi Germany, and we see how quickly professional opinion was swayed by Hitler, and the caliber of the people who went over to the Nazis, we are shocked. But we shouldn’t be shocked. Spectacular hoaxes and bogus ideologies are continually infecting public opinion in modern times. With us it is one craze after another. If we use our intuition, and consult our sense of pattern recognition, the global warming hoax looks very much like the nuclear winter hoax. Both involve the use of computer models – which are not scientific at all. Both involve the politicization of science.
Tracing the origin of the big lie naturally leads us to questions about the big liars themselves. Vice President Al Gore, the global warming propagandist-in-chief, started out as the political creature of the Soviet-connected businessman Armand Hammer. To know who Hammer was, is to know something about Al Gore. Readers are urged to get hold of a book, Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer, written by Edward Jay Epstein. It shows that Hammer worked for Soviet intelligence. This is clearly and carefully documented by Epstein. And so the genealogy of global warming goes something like this: (1) Soviet agent Armand Hammer sponsored the Gore family; (2) Albert Gore, Jr. sponsored the man-made global warming theory; (3) this theory has had a powerful negative impact on the U.S. economy; (4) the theory is promoted in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary; (5) scientists who oppose the theory are often blackballed.
Al Gore is a man with a mediocre mind – hardly distinguished by any accomplishments or virtues. If he actually wrote the books that carry his name, we cannot say they are works of literature. And as for their scientific value, well, there is no real science in them either. Yet, in this world of false appearances with its political frauds, Al Gore received a Nobel Peace Prize. And when he was at the Norwegian Nobel Institute on 10 December 2007, Gore made the following remarks:
We, the human species, are confronting a planetary emergency – a threat to the survival of our civilization that is gathering ominous and destructive potential even as we gather here. But there is hopeful news as well: we have the ability to solve this crisis and avoid the worst – though not all – of its consequences. If we act boldly, decisive and quickly.
This bold and decisive action which Gore advocates has already involved untold billions in losses for U.S. businesses and taxpayers. And with economic weakening comes a military weakening. Here is the main purpose of the global warming hoax. As reported by the Guardian UK, Gore recently dropped a bid for a major new “green” web domain to make way for an organization supported by Mikhail Gorbachev. Well, of course, there is a pecking order among these people.
In all of this I have only, barely, scratched the surface. A researcher in Germany recently sent me an essay by Soviet academician Ivan Frolov, written in 1982. In this essay, “Global Problems and the Future of Mankind,” Frolov remarked that the “pollution of the environment, the destruction of ecosystems, the destruction of many species … have now reached threatening proportions.” These “dangerous disharmonies in man’s interactions with nature are associated with … the capitalist socio-economic formation….” Therefore, these disharmonies require a “fundamental social transformation” if they are to be resolved. In other words, as Evo Morales made perfectly clear, environmentalism is the path to socialism. “As a result of the formation of a layer of carbon dioxide around the Earth which encloses it like a glass cover,” wrote Frolov, “the threat of unfavorable changes in climate has arisen that may transform our blue planet into an enormous greenhouse … with possible catastrophic effects.”
As a communist official and future Politburo member, Frolov was putting man-made global warming in its political context – years before it would become a major theme in the West. The fact that Al Gore has followed Frolov’s formula of using environmentalism as a political weapon, and that the Gore family was supported by Armand Hammer, should give the reader some indication of what global warming is about. As with the statement of President Morales of Bolivia, we find in global warming a justification for replacing capitalism with socialism. In 1996 Mikhail Gorbachev acknowledged that the “threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.” As Frolov noted in 1982, “The effect of such an approach could be enormous if it could also be applied on a wider international scale in situations in which the interests of mankind at large are harmed by the activities of individual persons or organizations pursuing private interests.” (Italics added.)
KGB/SVR disinformation operations are not fiction. They are happening all around us. Tomorrow’s disinformation is not as yet known, but whatever it might be – we will believe it. In 1959, while on a visit to the United States, Khrushchev told U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ezra Taft Benson, “Your grandchildren will live under Communism.” When Benson attempted to argue the point, Khrushchev reportedly said, “You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.” This type of boasting, which is so full of confidence, could only have been made by someone who has already watched many successful operations.
In a Gallup poll conducted in 2014 nearly 40 percent of Americans are “concerned believers” in global warming while only one in four are solidly skeptical. As reported last January by the New York Times, “An overwhelming majority of the American public, including half of Republicans, support government action to curb global warming, according to a poll conducted by The New York Times, Stanford University and the nonpartisan environmental research group Resources for the Future.” This poll was said to have “implications for the 2016 presidential campaign.” According to the poll, voters are unlikely to vote for a candidate who questions or denies the science behind global warming.
The poll (above) suggests that the next U.S. president will be ready to sign greenhouse gas legislation. The only thing we need, for the crippling of our economy, is the Democrats in control of both houses of Congress. According to The Heritage Foundation in 2008, rules proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency in order to cope with global warming were so crazy, in effect, they would have cost trillions of dollars and millions of jobs. We do not know how narrow our escape from these rules may have been. The fact that some government officials are literally insane, and that the aforesaid insanity has been induced in them by agents of influence working for a hostile foreign power, is nowhere discussed or suspected. People are so ignorant regarding the existence of agents of influence, and the work they do, that the subject rarely comes up in any context. It is only when we realize the colossal scale of the global warming scam that an explanation for its purpose and origin cries out to our common sense
A power is at work. How else could a false idea prevail over fact and reason, common sense and our daily experience of the weather? Millions of people in both Hemispheres have now experienced cold winters and cool summers. How is this explained by the global warming crowd? They claim it is due to a “polar vortex.” Yes, that’s right. The winters are colder because the planet is getting warmer. And if you believe this vortex nonsense, then you should probably not be allowed to vote or operate heavy machinery. As one Soviet citizen memorably said, the individual is not merely oppressed by the big lie. He is actively humiliated by its stupidity. The more outrageous the lie, the more it devalues the individual, proving to him that his reason does not matter.
There is also the destruction of the careers of many who have actively argued against global warming. The fact that this also partakes of the Soviet style should not be overlooked. The destruction of dissenters, not by argument but by administrative punishment, is typical of totalitarianism. Scientists who disagree with global warming are numerous, yet they are actively intimidated by people who have no ethics and no integrity. Fewer and fewer scientists are willing to speak out, since they can easily guess what the consequences will be. Examples of scientists persecuted for disagreeing with global warming would include Professor Murry Salby in Australia, and Dr. Robert Carter. Also there is the case of Dr. Caleb Rossiter, adjunct Professor at American University, who was fired last year by a progressive think tank after publicly voicing doubts about global warming. Lennart Bengtsson at the University of Reading in England says he fears for his safety on account of an academic witch hunt by American global warming activists. These and other stories only scratch the surface. Sadly, in relation to all of this, we see the term “global warming McCarthyism” used. Even here, when attempting to expose the wicked tactics of intimidation and censorship, we fall into the trap of adopting the enemy’s catchphrase – the very thing that made all of this possible in the first place; that is, the destruction of Senator Joseph McCarthy, and that old propaganda inversion in which the tactics of McCarthy’s enemies are attributed to McCarthy! Insofar as we are conditioned to a false history, I do not see how we can defend ourselves against subversive tactics unless we first realize the history of these tactics, and those persons already victimized by them. (See Diana West's recent essay.)
In conclusion, it must be acknowledged that green is the new red. Oh yes, without any doubt. And that is why the General Secretary of the Communist Party Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, has become the head of Green Cross International. It is why the most highly placed Kremlin agents in America support global warming. Here is testimony to the power of communism in the United States. Of course, many readers will think this analysis is paranoid. Well, we stopped fighting communist subversion a long time ago. Given this fact, we should expect to see communists in the White House, in Congress, in the federal bureaucracy. We should expect to find them in the Republican Party, and writing in the pages of National Review. Today our government tells us that colder winters are due to global warming, and that Iranian nukes will make us safer. To search for the origin of these fairy tales, and to draw an appropriate conclusion, is not paranoia. It is a passageway to sanity.
[Note: For those interested, see the BBC documentary, The Great Global Warming Swindle.]