When reading the following words, you want to ask: “Which ones?”
WWGO
in some cases
some significant
sometimes
much of
a couple of
many of
There were certainly instances
sometimes
and others
some State Department officials
TSF
But U.S. planners…
B
some of
many other
sometimes
several places
other writers
several others
as some have
Speculations. I note that Dr. Lipkes criticizes Ms. West of what he himself is doing. Just like is the case of the use of “de facto”. (“But if her speculations are dubious, she is correct….”)
WWGO
Possibly
Possibly
Possibly again
Puzzling
TSF
more plausible pretext
possibly precipitating
Perhaps Radosh….
If Russia had collapsed
Perhaps
B
It’s always hazardous guessing the motives of others.
Were there personal motives?
What about political motives?
What about paleoconservatives vs. neoconservatives?
It is possible that he (Radosh) sees
So it may be fair to say
mystery
Persons who politically are Socialists, Liberals or Democrats would hardly call themselves “Leftists." The use of the word indicates that you don’t belong to anyone of those categories, but are one of the “good guys."
WWGO
New Left historians
the Left
the Leftist consensus
TSF
the Leftists in
The Left
B
New Left historians
Rhetoric of the Left
The Left
His (Radosh’s) articles about the Left are always astute and informative.
the Right
refugees from the Left
New Leftists
Those on the Left
